Friday, October 8, 2010

Ducks Athletics Takes a Big Bite of Cash

Posted By on Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:26 PM

The Oregonian’s Rachel Bachman has written an investigative report that ought to make even the most diehard supporters of the green and gold see red.

It seems the University of Oregon athletic department’s claim that it’s financially self-sufficient is a few yards shy of the truth. What the hell, why mince words – it’s a lie.

Going through U of O financial records, Bachman discovered that hundreds of thousands of dollars a year come out of the university’s general fund to pay for academic support of athletes – personal tutoring and counseling, basically.

“The general fund has paid nearly $8.5 million over the past nine years for academic support for athletes … increasing sixfold from less than $300,000 in 2002-03 to a budgeted $1.8 million this academic year,” Bachman reports.

“Meanwhile tuition has nearly doubled and state support has plummeted to 7 percent of the university's overall budget. Use of the general fund to academically support athletes means that other students essentially are subsidizing those services.”

At Oregon State, $1.8 million a year comes out of the college’s general fund for academic support of athletes. But OSU, unlike the U of O, doesn’t claim that its athletic department is self-sufficient.

“Then-athletic director Pat Kilkenny wrote in a July 2007 editorial in Eugene's Register-Guard newspaper, ‘We receive no funding from the state or the university general funds,’” Bachman wrote. “On the Ducks' athletic site, the page introducing the Duck Athletic Fund says, ‘the University of Oregon Athletic Department is financially self-sufficient and does not receive any support from state funds.’”

What’s really depressing, though, is that Bachman’s story is accompanied by an on-line poll asking readers: “How do you feel about Oregon's athletic department, despite claims of self-sufficiency, using state money to cover athletes' academic needs?” Only about 32% (at this writing) say they’re “troubled by it,” nearly 13% say they’re “indifferent,” and the clear majority – about 55% – say they’re “fine with it.”

How much do you want to bet that many of the 55-percenters are among the most tireless complainers about taxes for education?

  • Pin It

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

More by The Source Staff

Latest in The Wandering Eye

  • Moonshine Magic in Bend Still on the Down Low

    Get ready for our great close-up on the home distilling community out next week in our "Best of" issue. We interviewed a mixed bag of legal and anarchist distillers in Bend to find out why distilling is so very, very against the law in one's home.
    • Aug 9, 2012
  • The Eye Wanders Off Into the Sunset

    I’m really sorry to break the bad news to them during this season of peace and goodwill, but after this week the right-wingers in Bend and vicinity won’t have The Wandering Eye to kick around anymore. The decision to stop writing this blog was my own, and it was prompted by several factors.
    • Dec 26, 2010
  • DADT, Gay-Bashing and the "Icky-ness" Factor

    For the past week or so, “Zeo” of the NW Republican blog has had his jock strap in a knot over the prospect of Congress repealing the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” rule. To hear Zeo tell it, if DADT is repealed and gays are allowed to serve openly in the US military it will mean the end not only of our armed forces but of America, its economic system and civilization in general.
    • Dec 19, 2010
  • More »

© 2016 LAY IT OUT INC | 704 NW GEORGIA, BEND, OREGON 97703  |   Privacy Policy

Website powered by Foundation