Pin It

Getting Gored by Pronghorn Again 

Pronghorn builders aren't exactly keeping up to speed with the lodging units.

Back in 2002, the developers of Pronghorn promised Deschutes County that - as state law requires - they'd build 192 lodging units at their swanky "destination resort" out among the scrub junipers east of Tumalo. At least 150 units were supposed to be in place by 2007.

Instead, in an event that's come to be as predictable as the crocuses popping up in spring, they've kept coming before the Deschutes County Commission hat in hand to plead for a little more time. Times are tough, they say. Tourism numbers are down. They just can't make all those lodging units pencil out right now.

So as of March, Pronghorn had built only 48 of the promised 192 overnight accommodation units - the same number as four years ago.

Early this month the developers again made their yearly pilgrimage before the county commission. This time they're asking for two more years to build one hotel that was supposed to have been finished a year ago, and an additional four years for a second hotel that supposedly would be completed in 2013.

But wait - there's more.

Gerald Casilli, who put money into a trust fund to guarantee completion of the hotels, now wants the county to accept an "irrevocable letter of credit" - basically an IOU - in place of the $9.2 million that's currently in the fund.

And there's even more: Casilli is asking the county to release the $690,000 in interest that has accumulated in the trust fund to him.

Up to now we never realized that "Casilli" was an alternate spelling for "chutzpah."

(A little digression here: County Commissioner Tammy Baney recently discovered that Pronghorn has been charging guests a 3% fee for use of its recreation facilities and claiming - in violation of the law - that it's a county tax. And three years ago Pronghorn workers were caught stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of plants from public lands. These incidents, of course, have no direct relationship to the lodging unit issue - but they do add to the general aroma of sleaziness that wafts over Pronghorn's dealings with the public.)

Some, like our colleagues on The Bulletin's editorial page, say the county should roll over for Pronghorn once again. The county "gains nothing" by taking a hard line, they say, but it if caves it will have "the possibility of a healthy resort."

As for gaining nothing, we'd say $9.2 million is a pretty sizeable chunk of gain - not to mention serving notice on the developers, and others who might try to work the same scam, that Deschutes County takes the law seriously and intends to enforce it.

As for "the possibility of a healthy resort," we'd say that after 10 years that possibility ranks somewhere between Charles Manson getting paroled and John Lennon turning up alive in Madras.

The county commission is mulling whether to grant the Pronghorn developers their requests. We believe it's long past time to draw a line in the sand, or the sagebrush, and join us in giving them THE BOOT.

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Latest in Editorial

More by Source Weekly

Readers also liked…

© 2016 LAY IT OUT INC | 704 NW GEORGIA, BEND, OREGON 97703  |   Privacy Policy

Website powered by Foundation