My next stop was Goodwill and I wanted to load as much of this perfectly good (I repeat, NEW) footwear in my SUV and take it to Goodwill where the items would benefit those in need. I was told by a landfill employee and the fellow dumping his trash next to me that these items were considered waste once they "hit the floor" of the landfill building and could not be retrieved by anyone. The fellow next to me knew of this "policy" because he once witnessed 40 new spa covers being unloaded at this site. His own spa cover was damaged and he wanted to replace it with a new one. He was told that was not allowed.
I don't advocate the public being allowed to scavenge through trash for usable items, but this was a blatant display of someone's misconception of "trash" that went into the landfill when it could have easily benefited those in need.
I saw this as a county policy gone wrong and my disdain was initially toward the county for this policy. But prevention is the best step to eliminate a potential problem [so] I'm addressing the business(es) that would take such an action to unload unwanted inventory. I hope they are reading this opinion and, as a result, will look to a solution that would be twofold: (1) eliminate unnecessary dumping in the landfill and (2) provide for the consumer in need of basic essentials.
I doubt the effort to direct such "waste" to a community-serving organization, such as Goodwill, would have taken any more effort than dumping it at the landfill. Waste not, want not. Live sustainably.
- William Clendenning
Speaking of The Boot
-
Bend Brewfest '17: The Cheat Sheet
Aug 9, 2017 -
Now You Know
Jul 26, 2017 -
Mexican Lager All Summer
Jul 19, 2017 - More »
Latest in The Mailbox
-
Letters to the Editor: August 7-14
Readers react to "Us vs Them" mentality
- Aug 16, 2017
-
Letters to the Editor: July 31-August 7
The Community Reacts to Vandalism at Pilot Butte
- Aug 9, 2017
-
Letters to the Editor July 24-31
- Aug 2, 2017
- More »
More by Source Weekly
-
Critical City Services
- Feb 22, 2017
-
Picks 1/25-2/1
- Jan 25, 2017
- More »
Readers also liked…
-
Letters to the Editor: April 22-May1
- May 3, 2017
-
Letters 1/6-1/13
- Jan 6, 2016
