The Senate's "Dr. No" | The Source Weekly - Bend, Oregon
The Source Weekly’s reporting is made possible by the power of your support. Be a part of it!
Pin It

The Senate's "Dr. No" 

There are traditions that are inspiring, like laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day. There are traditions that are

There are traditions that are inspiring, like laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day. There are traditions that are fun, like trimming the Christmas tree or ridiculing American Idol.

And then there are traditions that are just plain stupid, like the one in the US Senate that allows any senator to put a "hold" on legislation for any reason - or no reason.

The Senate's most prominent user, and abuser, of the tradition is Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma. Coburn is a rather odd bird whose positions on issues range all over the ideological map. For example, he was one of only a handful of Republican senators to vote against the Iraq war funding bill in 2007. But he's also a hard-core right-to-lifer who has said he would support the death penalty for doctors who perform abortions.

Coburn also is a crusader against drugs - he was the chief sponsor of a proposal to require drug testing of all members of Congress and their staffs - and against unsafe sex. In the latter role, according to a recent Oregonian story, he delivers "lunchtime lectures to new staffers and interns about the danger of sexually transmitted disease. The sessions include pizza and graphic images ... "

Above all, Coburn sees himself as engaged in a one-man war against wasteful federal spending, which, in his mind, apparently includes pretty much all federal spending. He's exercised his "hold" privilege so many times that his Senate colleagues have nicknamed him "Dr. No."

One of the recent victims of Dr. No is a bill to add more than 128,000 acres to the Mt. Hood National Wilderness. The bill was crafted with bipartisan support from Oregon's congressional delegation, including Republican Rep. Greg Walden, Republican Sen. Gordon Smith and Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden. It was unanimously approved by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and seemed headed for quick passage by unanimous consent on the Senate floor.

And then Dr. No said no.

Coburn doesn't have any problem with the bill per se, he says. It wouldn't negatively affect his home state in any way, which is the usual reason for senators to apply a "hold." It just irks him because it would involve a modest amount of federal spending - about $11 million. "We can't do it. We don't have the money," he said.

Coburn's veto means the Mt. Hood wilderness bill most likely will have to be wrapped into a broader national wilderness bill, where its fate will be subject to the vagaries of congressional politics.

We don't know what makes Tom Coburn do what he does. Maybe he's sincerely concerned. Maybe he's trying to strike a tough-on-spending pose for the benefit of the folks back in Oklahoma. Maybe he's on an ego trip.

Whatever the motive, his pigheaded attitude has potentially endangered a precious natural area that's of incalculable value not just to Oregonians but to the people of the whole nation. For that, we're giving him THE BOOT.

About The Author

Pin It


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

Today | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri
One-Day Metal Scrap Bladesmith Workshop

One-Day Metal Scrap Bladesmith Workshop - DIY Cave

Sat., Sept. 24, 10:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
Submitting an event is free and easy.

Newsletter Signup

Get Central Oregon daily news
directly in your inbox

Get Social

Latest in Editorial

More by H. Bruce Miller

  • Who is John Galt? Who Gives a Crap?: Atlas Shrugged's tea party flops hard

    Members of the Ayn Rand cult have waited 54 years for a movie version of her magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged. They finally have one that's true to the letter and spirit of the book. And that's the problem.
    • May 11, 2011
  • LandWatch Goes to the Mattresses Over Resorts

    The fight over Deschutes County's new destination resort rules isn't finished yet: Central Oregon LandWatch has put the county on notice that it plans to challenge them. LandWatch filed ìnotices of intent to appealî Thursday with the state Land Use Board of Appeals, charging that the county's new rules for determining what lands are eligible for resorts ìactually increase the development potential in the county.
    • Aug 23, 2010
  • Waste and Fraud: Walden Goes After the Big Game

    Eastern Oregon's own Rep. Greg Walden and a couple of other Republican congressmen have unleashed their righteous wrath on a federal program that helps low-income folks heat their homes.
    • Jul 2, 2010
  • More »

Want to advertise with us?

For info on print and digital advertising, >> Click Here

© 2022 LAY IT OUT INC | 704 NW GEORGIA AVE, BEND, OREGON 97703  |   Privacy Policy

Website powered by Foundation