Willie Nelson has recently joined the millions of people speaking out for 9/11 truth and working towards an independent citizens’ investigation into the attacks. Willie’s statements are based upon his own observation of the events and common sense. Put simply, Willie is thinking for himself and possesses the courage to speak out.
Willie’s voice, as part of the 9/11 truth movement, is important because he is widely appreciated by country music and contemporary music lovers alike. His voice and music have appeal for their creativity and integrity. One might say that Willie Nelson has bridged the social gap between the rednecks and the hippies. He is a real uniter.
When asked recently by radio talk show host Alex Jones if he had questions about 9/11, Willie responded, “I certainly do. I saw those towers fall and I’ve seen an implosion in Las Vegas. There’s too much similarities between the two. And I saw the building fall [Building 7] that didn’t get hit by nothing. So, how naรฏve are we? What do they think we’ll go for?”
Bill O’Reilly, upon hearing about Willie’s remarks, called Nelson a “pinhead.” O’Reilly, as do all critics of the 9/11 truth movement, resorted to name-calling. Name-calling is all they have. Proponents of the government’s conspiracy theory of 9/11 peddle a faulty fable which cannot stand up to reason, common sense, honest questioning or scientific scrutiny.
If one studies some of the vast amount of citizen research into the 9/11 attacks and understands the basic laws of physics which were violated in order for the official theory to be true, one begins to see that O’Reilly is just a corporate-controlled media bully, attempting to intimidate any individual who would think for himself. That three skyscrapers, hit by two planes, imploded in a manner sharing at least 10 features in common with controlled demolition does not faze the “thick headed” O’Reilly.
If I were to believe for a moment that Bill O’Reilly has more integrity than Willie Nelson, or if I let O’Reilly manipulate my thinking about 9/11 or anything else, or if I were to continue to believe the Big Lie about 9/11 which has been foisted on us by this corrupt of group of neo-cons with their imperialistic agenda and hired-gun media, I, too, would be a pinhead.
Sam Humphrey
This article appears in Mar 13-19, 2008.
MAKE LOCAL JOURNALISM HAPPEN
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
I’ll bet Sasquatch and a disgruntled Tooth Fairy were involved with the Goverment Agents!
Well then, I guess I was mistaken about this issue. Now that noted physicist Willie Nelson has issued his findings how can any of us deny the truth that has been right there in front of us the whole time.
What a joke!
Yes, Willie Nelson is certainly an expert. There are a couple of things he is really expert at. One is, longevity in the country music business. Two is, smoking an enormous amount of very potent ganja.
I’m unconvinced either of these two glorious accomplishments qualifies him to speak intelligently on any other subject.
That you are so impressed by Willie’s stoned opinion, speaks more about your desperation to support an obviously deluded theory, than any fact. Opinion is just opinion and is never a substitute for facts, no matter the fame, or the intoxication level, of the deluded who share your misconceptions.
Physics doesn’t lie. Jet fuel does not melt steal. Structures do not fall into the path of greatest resistance. And Building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane. NIST can’t explain it.
Check out architects and engineers for 9/11 truth if you
want to see what the experts say.They agree with Willie.
Believe it or not Source readers, I am going to agree with Bill’s first four factual statements.
“Physics doesn’t lie.”
Sure don’t.
“Jet fuel does not melt steal”
No, but burning jet fuel sure does.
“Structures do not fall into the path of greatest resistance.”
Right again, that is why they fell in on themselves. The strength of the towers was in its outer frame work.
“And Building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane”
You’re four for four. Building 7 was weakened from fires on the 5th and 7th floors as well as debris damage from the falling towers.
Nice try Bill. But an “expert” that “agrees with Willie” on any subject besides marginal country music, dope smoking, or tax dodging isn’t going to get 30 seconds of my time.
What do your so called experts say about aluminum poisoning caused by wearing your foil hat too often?
Jet fuel may not melt steel but is sure as hell heats it up enough to weaken it to a point that thousands of pounds of other steel would break it. And your path of “greatest resistance” may be just that but once you get an object in motion it stays in motion until acted upon by another force, which in this case was strait down considering the sheer mass of the top of the buildings in question acting upon the rest. Unless you want to tell me that Sir Isaac Newton and all other physicists following him have been wrong.
The jet fuel was gone on impact. Do you really believe that Building 7 was the first building in history to collapse by fire alone? Steel melts at roughly 2600 degrees F. The entire building was not flooded with jet fuel. Open your minds people. Governments cover things up all the time.