Paranormal Activity is terrifying and not just jump-out-of-your-seat-screaming scary – this one will have you seriously considering rearranging your life so that you can sleep only during daylight hours.

A couple of young yuppies, Micah and Katie, are experiencing some strange goings-on in their suburban San Diego home. Micah buys a camera and sets it up in their bedroom each night. He becomes such a camera nut (the latest in clichรฉs, for this new wave of faux reality movies) that he also documents much of the rest of their lives within the house. In the style of The Blair Witch Project, we are presented with the found footage, provided by the local police department for our entertainment.

What we see unfold is otherworldly, but it is not the paranormal that makes this film deeply horrifying. Micah and Katie have been together three years, enjoying the first months of sharing a home when Katie reveals that a reoccurring strangeness she’s experienced since childhood has returned. What happens between this couple, as the goings-on become more and more difficult to laugh off, implants a thought far more chilling than any evil spirit. The implication is that you can’t trust anyone, especially not those you love. It’s not a matter of bad judgment, more that if things take a turn for the worse, you’re going to find it difficult to jump ship.

Their relationship is utterly convincing – Micah is protective, Katie is stubborn and they bicker over how to manage the situation. A psychic tells them the malicious force will feed off of any negative energy in the house. Despite mounting evidence that Katie has brought some serious baggage into the relationship, Micah is determined to solve the problem. Of everything we see, and don’t see, the scene in which the couple go through their nighttime routine of removing the decorative cushions and quilt from their bed resonates. It’s the domestic, rather than the demonic, that will creep out adults for days after. This note lends a clever bit of viscera to the stream of shocks. Horror movies have long made you fear the ordinary, but this one will stop you from being able to forget about it over a glass of wine.

The film was shot in director Oren Peli’s house with two of his friends over a week. It cost just $15,000. Critics are enthused by the lack of on-screen violence or showy special effects. They’re right, Peli has done an awful lot with very little. A one-line story, two people and a handheld camera. In an interview the director said, “Micah believes he can outsmart it. You think you have access to all this technology, you can do anything. But it doesn’t matter. In the end, this ancient, primal thing is stronger.” The same could be said of Peli, as his DIY filmmaking trumps big-budget fare.

Paranormal Activity, however, does fall prey to some of the usual horror tropes. Some ideas are not followed through to their natural conclusion, leaving loopholes of plausibility that allow an audience to argue over how they would have acted differently. The couple is too confined – they seem to have no friends and only one relative – and even though it’s not the house, but Katie that is haunted, they never leave to explore how the spirits might behave at the local supermarket. They also are disinclined to put much effort into soliciting paranormal-fighting support. But the movie’s improvised and inherently terrifying nature paints over most of these cracks.

All in all, if you do see Paranormal Activity, perhaps be prepared to wish you hadn’t. It is going to take some heavy repeat watching of Mamma Mia to forget.

Paranormal Activity โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โœฉ

Directed by Oren Peli. Written by Oren Peli. Starring Katie Featherston, Micah Sloat, Mark Fredrichs

$
$
$

We're stronger together! Become a Source member and help us empower the community through impactful, local news. Your support makes a difference!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Trending

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS, BUT NOT REALLY. THE MOVIE IS ALREADY SPOILED!!

    no, theres more! plot devices galore!

    why is this not more often compared to friday the 13th where teens run into dangers arms instead of fleeing? i offer:

    -requiring the entire film to be shot with beavis’s handycam, micah continues videotaping his girlfriend when it is clearly absured and obnixious. most people not only dont like little palmcorders stuck in their face, even for a minute, but the ‘rig’ he has put together would be overbearing. he almost never shuts it off to her demand. because without this, it would not be able to be a movie. its unnatural at best.

    -walking around the house investigating an intruder in the middle of the night using only the ‘rig’s light? please. plot devices 101.

    -leaving your girlfriend sleeping by the bedroom door when an intruder is likely to visit again.. and again….and ? girly man? no, plot device (i wont spoil the ending)

    -crawling up into an attic when the access door has been opened by an intruder, and leaving your girlfriend alone downstairs while you crawl away into the rafters.. all the while she insists you dont??? priceless.

    -does 911 not work on these phones?

    -the whole ouija board thing… wtf? just dropped? huh??

    -these two just doze off nightly as if nothing is going on? no details in this movie at all. no other parts of their lives, no development of the characters.

    i will not ramble on, the film will do that for you.

    i really wanted to like this, but it started off slow and then the male lead (micah) just got more and more obnoxious as it became painfully obvious he really could care less about his girlfriend. the fraudulent marketing of audience reaction (i sat in the back row at a sold out late show on friday, in a good sized city in ohio) and there was not large scale freakout of any kind. every good scene is in the trailer and at that some of it is grossly misrepresented.
    my goal of being part of cinema history by tossing another 10 spot into paramounts pocket and being part of the hype was completed.

    as a final comment i just want to say i speculate its success has a lot to do with the proliferation of reality TV. this was unscripted, thus no ‘acting'(ie: houses never burn down without the fire inspector being able to determine the cause, except in movies where there is no script, therefore, no research. you leave it up to the actors guesswork). there is no soundtrack of any kind. no special effects or much in the way of makeup (dont care about that, but it sure does make it cheap).
    real life is boring, even reality TV is ‘scripted’, but without a script and actors. get what i am saying. i dont find the unscripted banter appealing for an hour and 40 minutes. this would have worked good as a 30 minute short film. i mean really, anyone could do this in their house.
    so bottom line, this is not a sustainable genre of filmmmaking we have here. a series of this kind of thing just wouldnt hold up, how many times would you pay good coin for this kind of moviemaking?
    it was marketing, marketing and marketing. speilerg is behind it. nuff said.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *