An Oregon State University economist has come out with a report pretty much demolishing the conservative propaganda that Oregon is Tax Hell and two measures on the January ballot will make it much worse.

William Jaeger compared tax rates in Oregon with those of other states over a period of 17 years and found that, as a percentage of personal income, the nationwide average state tax rate has remained a fairly steady 6.4% while Oregonโ€™s has averaged 6% — and itโ€™s been trending down, not up.

Jaegerโ€™s data show that Oregon currently ranks 44th out of the 50 states in terms of state taxes as a percentage of total personal income, at 5%. The nationwide average is now 6%.

The increase in corporate taxes under Measure 67 and in the marginal personal tax rate under Measure 66, which would apply only to the most affluent 3% of the stateโ€™s taxpayers (individuals with incomes above $125,000 or couples with incomes above $250,000), โ€œwould only partly narrow, not eliminate, the gap between Oregonโ€™s taxes and the national average,โ€ according to Jaeger.

Even with the passage of both measures, he goes on, โ€œhigh-income earners [in Oregon] would still pay lower average tax rates than lower-income earners. The effect of these changes on Oregonโ€™s business taxes overall would still leave Oregon ranked 46th out of 50 states in business taxes as a share of gross state product.โ€

As Oregonโ€™s tax rate has fallen compared to the national average, Jaegerโ€™s data show, its standing among the states in terms of the quality of public services has dropped too.

โ€œAt Oregonโ€™s public universities, funding in real dollars per student has gone down by more than half in 20 years, and faculty salaries are 10โ€“17 percent below national averages โ€” meaning that itโ€™s harder to attract good teachers and researchers,โ€ Jaeger writes. โ€œAt the same time, average education levels in our state have gone down too: only 28.8% of younger Oregonians have college degrees compared to 33.4% of older Oregonians. These trends in Oregonโ€™s public services and average education levels raise concern about how Oregon will be able to compete nationally and internationally.โ€

Jaegerโ€™s study โ€œcites a survey of dozens of scholarly, peer-reviewed economic studies and concludes that increases in taxes, when used to expand the quality of public services, can promote economic development and growth in employment,โ€ said an OSU press release.

Jaeger quoted Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University and Peter Orzag, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, as saying: โ€œTax increases on higher-income families are the least damaging mechanism for closing state fiscal deficits in the short run.โ€

โ€œStiglitz and others conclude that cutting social services further harms those already hurt by the recession, while a tax increase on high-income groups affects only those who are doing well during a recession,โ€ Jaeger said.

On the other hand, if our goal is to make Oregon the Mississippi of the West we can follow the conservativesโ€™ advice and continue down the path of cutting taxes and services.

$
$
$

We're stronger together! Become a Source member and help us empower the community through impactful, local news. Your support makes a difference!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Trending

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. In 1979 framing carpenters working for my Dad were paid $17/hr and a young man fresh out of high school could go to work in any of 100 lumber mills in Oregon at $14/Hr A New pickup cost $5000.-6000. and a decent house was $40,000. Today I can hire framers at $12-15./hr and if you could find work in one of the few mills still open it would be at $14/hr and a pickup costs $45,000. and a house $200,000-$300,000. and we wonder why life is getting harder. Lets thank everyone who buys foreign products and our president for stimulating banks and to build roads and bridges which immediately benefit only a few instead of directing it to stimulate manufacturing and require them to pay a family wage and stimulate jobs. Putting millions back to work. Shame on you all for buying Kia, Nissan, Mazda, Toyota, Honda, and other foreign cars, take a look at Michigan and see what you’ve done to your American neighbors who have shed their blood beside you to defend this country. Detroit is a ghost town. Chevy, Ford, and Dodge build vehicles that get as good or better mileage today as any of them and last as long or longer.

  2. “Shame on you all for buying Kia, Nissan, Mazda, Toyota, Honda, and other foreign cars”

    Let’s remember, though, that a lot of those “foreign” cars are built in the USA now. My wife’s Subaru was built in Indiana. Mercedes has been building cars in Alabama for 10 years.

    And it’s not just cars that are the problem. Go into almost any kind of store and try to find ANYTHING, from HDTVs to shoes, that wasn’t made in some low-wage, Third World country, usually China.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *