Many people lack sympathy for landlords jacking up rents to the max in areas with close to zero vacancy rates. Housing involves real people with real lives, and the current housing environment is not very healthy for affordable home ownership or rental. The argument can be made that home affordability is important because homeowners and long-term tenants put down roots and contribute to the community. When rents or housing prices are high, many people move elsewhere and potential skilled workers turn down employment in those areas. Many communities across the country are experiencing the same problems we see in Bend and Portland, but we don’t hear much about solutions and the housing inventory keeps shrinking and driving up prices for both rentals and home purchases.

The Portland City Council has recently enacted a new law as an attempt to deal with what has been called a housing emergency. Councilors first attempted to pass a rent freeze, which failed, but the new law seeks to have the same effect by requiring landlords to provide relocation assistance to tenants under certain circumstances. In a nutshell, if a landlord raises rents by more than 10 percent, and if this raise forces the tenant to move, the landlord will be required to pay the tenant between $2,900 and $4,500 for relocation assistance. The amount is dependent on the size of the original lease. It’s designed to cover moving costs, first and last month’s rent and security deposit for the tenant’s move.

The housing affordability crisis is getting more critical in Bend as well. It’s been a challenge with few solutions implemented, thus increasing the push to take action. While the intentions are good, there are pros and cons. It could be argued that more regulation could put further upward pressure on rents by encouraging landlords to raise rents by 9.9 percent per year when they might not have intended to do that much. It’s also important to remember that landlords own their properties and should be allowed to do what they want, within existing land use laws.

Source: http://www.opb.org/news/article/portland-passes-emergency-bill-requiring-payments-to-tenants-for-no-cause-evictions/

LOW

158 SE Heyburn St., Bend, OR 97702

2 beds, 1 bath, 738 square feet, .13 acre lot

Built in 1945

$168,000

Listed by Duke Warner Realty

MIDโ€‚ โ€‚

21185 NE Silverado Valley Lane., Bend, OR 97702

3 beds, 2.5 baths, 2,160 square feet, .12 acre lot

Built in 2006

$355,000

Listed by Lowes Commercial/Residential Branch

โ€‚HIGH

19378 Alianna Loop, Bend, OR 97702

3 beds, 3.5 baths, 2,448 square feet, .24 acre lot

Built in 2017

$764,990

Listed by Berkshire Hathaway HomeService

Related Stories

Out of Reach

Affordable housing isn’t a niche market anymore
$
$
$

We're stronger together! Become a Source member and help us empower the community through impactful, local news. Your support makes a difference!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Trending

Principal Broker at The Broker Network Realty in Bend, OR. Over 12 years experience in Real Estate working with buyers, sellers and investment properties.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. “Councilors first attempted to pass a rent freeze, which failed, but the new law seeks to have the same effect by requiring landlords to provide relocation assistance to tenants under certain circumstances.”

    This is not true on two counts. City Council never formally discussed a rent-freeze or held a vote on it or anything. It was shot down by City lawyers before it got to that stage. Secondly, the relocation assistance in no way “freezes rent”. Landlords are absolutely free to raise rents. There are just now costs of business (and temporary at that) that reflect the needs of community.

  2. To Joe from Portland -If a Portland councilor, in this case Chloe Eudaly, proposes a rent control measure and it does not have enough support with the rest of the council, it is a failed attempt. The fact that the new law incentivizes some landlords to limit rent increases to under 10% to avoid financial penalties makes it a form of rent control. The article is very clear here and the source article from OPB elaborates further:
    “The Portland City Council has recently enacted a new law as an attempt to deal with what has been called a housing emergency. Councilors first attempted to pass a rent freeze, which failed, but the new law seeks to have the same effect by requiring landlords to provide relocation assistance to tenants under certain circumstances. In a nutshell, if a landlord raises rents by more than 10 percent, and if this raise forces the tenant to move, the landlord will be required to pay the tenant between $2,900 and $4,500 for relocation assistance. The amount is dependent on the size of the original lease. It’s designed to cover moving costs, first and last month’s rent and security deposit for the tenant’s move. “

  3. The housing crisis is critical to Bend’s future. If we don’t fix things, Boulder, Colorado, with an average price of over 600,000 dollars is what we can look forward to, and people like teachers and firefighters priced out of the market completely.

    However: rent control is a terrible idea. What we need is more supply. This is something that pretty much all economists, whether they lean left or right agree on.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *