A developer is looking to Greenwood Cemetery, a 125-year-old graveyard, as prime grounds for new construction. Oregon Care Group LLC, a Washington-based company, purchased the Greenwood Cemetery along with seven other central Oregon properties in 2020 for $5.5 million. In October, the outfit filed a preliminary application to change the zoning of the Greenwood Cemetery from public facilities to RM (medium density residential). While the owners told the surrounding neighborhood that the proposed zone-change was purely clerical in nature, it also staked out the property for a partition last December. In early January, the City of Bend issued a stop work order to the company for clear-cutting more than 70 trees without the City’s authorization. Now that the City has indicated it will unilaterally update its code, the owner has flip-flopped its position, stating it will continue to seek the zone change to allow for development of 50% of the property.
Greenwood Cemetery
Greenwood Cemetery has operated since the early 1900s, originally by Charles P. Niswonger, and was dedicated in perpetuity for the exclusive use as a cemetery in 1925. The burial ground includes many historically significant Bend family names, war veteran graves and even a CIA agent. It is the only place that allows gunshots within city limits, to honor and salute a war veteran being laid to rest. Not only is it Bend’s only graveyard within city limits, it is a sprawling greenspace. This cemetery complex is comparable to an arboretum, laced with walking paths that attract dog walkers, birders, deer and their fawns, children learning to ride bikes safely away from cars, and the occasional sulking black lipsticked goth girl shielding her eyes from the brightness of the sun. Classes of students from Bend High regularly walk to and around the cemetery during school, and others use the cemetery to connect to the footpath and tunnel under Greenwood to get to Pilot Butte. It’s one of the largest privately held greenspaces in central Bend.
The zone change
Oregon Care Group filed its pre-application for a zone change in October of last year. The proposed zone change would allow the building of 21.7 housing units per acre — a stark change from the neighborhood that it abuts, which consists primarily of single level, single- family homes. On Dec. 14 during a public comment period for the zone change, the owner’s attorney, Adam Smith of Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, argued that the RM zoning sought was a natural transition to the complexes on the opposite side of Pilot Butte State Park.
Smith also said that the real purpose of the zone change was to ensure that his client could continue operation of the property as a cemetery, which was not expressly listed as a permitted use under the City’s Development Code. His client would gladly support any amendment of the code that would allow for cemetery uses in the Public Facilities Zone, he said, adding that an amendment of the code would be far more difficult than his client’s application for the zone change.
Now, the City has indicated that it will update its code to include cemeteries as uses permitted in the Public Facilities Zone. Smith also updated his client’s position, stating, “…we are working on modifying our application so that it only seeks to amend the zoning on the vacant portion of the property.”
At the same meeting in December, Oregon Care Group’s attorney stated, “There may be future development of the vacant part of the parcel, but there are no plans for development at this time.”
Two weeks later, the City issued a stop work order and violation notices to Oregon Care Group, Sun Country Engineering and individuals at Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt for violating the City’s tree preservation performance standards. Oregon Care Group had contracted for a portion of the cemetery to be clear cut, with the specific instruction that all stumps be left three feet high so they could be extracted by excavator. In numerous communications with the City, Smith insisted that his client was merely attempting to remove diseased and unhealthy trees from the property. Emails obtained via public records request indicate that when City staff questioned the contractor, he stated, “he was directed to clear cut the property,” and only left certain trees standing on his own accord because he thought that Oregon Care Group’s request was “a little excessive.”
Oregon Care Group contracted for its lot clearing nine months prior to holding its meeting with the surrounding neighborhood, informing them that it had no intention of developing the property.
The property owner also staked out a partition of the property, a portion separating about 8 acres of the property closest to the neighborhood. In 2021, Oregon Care Group received permission from the Deschutes County Commission to move the unmarked graves of the former impoverished of Bend, who were buried in this area. At the time, Oregon Care Group stated that the justification for the removal of such interred bodies was because, “inconsiderate people drive over the graves, leave trash, including hypodermic needles, and otherwise desecrate the graves.” This is now the portion of the property that it seeks to convert to medium density residential zoning.
“This is a space that should not be developed into apartments,” neighborhood resident Tom Scott explained. “First and foremost, it’s a graveyard. I can’t look out my window for 5 minutes without seeing people accessing the graveyard. Oregon Care Group is making the claim that rezoning this property will provide a smoother transition between single family housing and public facilities. To me that doesn’t ring true. We already have a graveyard providing that transition. Oregon Care Group’s lawyers are essentially saying that potential apartments abutting a graveyard is a better transition,” Scott added.
“Oregon Care Group’s lawyers stated that there is no way to add additional automobile access into the Greenwood Cemetery, which would pass all that traffic to Hawthorne and Franklin Avenues.”
The City of Bend has yet to issue a decision on the rezoning of the cemetery.
Editor’s note: Representatives for the property owners did not respond to our request for comment by our print deadline, but Adam Smith offered the following statement Feb. 29:
“Most importantly, we want to share that we are currently working on substantial revisions to the application in response to public comments. We will share those revisions once the application is finalized. Additionally, we want to reiterate our main reasons for submitting the zone change application:
“1) The property’s current Public Facilities Zoning is not ideal because the property is not publicly owned. The Public Facilities Zone’s stated purpose is to “provide area for buildings and facilities that are owned and operated by federal, state, or local governments, public utilities, special districts or nonprofit organizations,”;
“2) The applicant is interested in correcting the zoning on site in order to explore the potential to develop the vacant portion of the property in the future. However, no decisions have been made regarding developing that vacant property. Any future development occurring on the vacant property will need to be approved by the City. The applicant has absolutely no intention to ever re-develop the existing Greenwood Cemetery or to propose a project on the vacant property that impacts the Greenwood Cemetery.
“To reiterate the third point above, the proposed zone change is not anticipated to have any negative impact on the Greenwood Cemetery. The applicant has every intention of continuing to operate the Greenwood Cemetery in a manner that respects and dignifies the interred individuals, and that likewise provides a peaceful place for family and friends to visit their loved ones. The applicant’s primary purpose and business model is continuing to operate the Greenwood Cemetery, and any potential development that negatively impacts the Greenwood Cemetery will not be pursued. Stated simply, the applicant’s interest are aligned with those members of the community who wish to preserve the Greenwood Cemetery.
“Lastly, the applicant is aware of the recent news reports concerning trees being cut down on the property. Only trees that were dead, diseased, or threatening the health of other trees were cut down as part of the routine maintenance of what was otherwise an overgrown portion of the vacant property. No portion of the vacant property was “clear cut,” nor is it the applicant’s intent to “clear cut” the property in the future. After conducting a further investigation including visiting the site, meeting with the applicant’s arborist, and discussing the situation with the applicant’s consultant team, City staff provide us direction on how to move forward with the tree project if we elect to do so in the future.”
—Amanda Osteen is a resident in the area surrounding the Greenwood Cemetery.
This article appears in Source Weekly February 29, 2024.
MAKE LOCAL JOURNALISM HAPPEN
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Zone changes. Out of State developers. Growth Boundary moving at will of those with monetary interests. Commissioners on the take. Building height regulations skirted. Massive developments on the Westside with zero interest in fire escape options/traffic. On and on and on.
Long past time to call this what it is. A corrupt City of Bend and Deschutes County and Brooks Resources doing whatever they please in the name of financial gain.
We all see it. The Source touches on some of this but media in this county refuses to put pressure on these people and hold them accountable.
Bendifornia is a real thing people. This mountain town is going to be Oregon’s 4th largest city in short order. People, it’s a 2 hour drive up to the Bachelor parking lot (which is often full now, with no place to park cars)……..it’s a 20 mile drive!!
Demand change. Vote all these people out!
Source folks – you should be ashamed. The person who wrote this piece has a vested interest in the issue and has demonstrated opposition to potential housing, including guaranteed affordable housing, near to where they live. Noting where they live is not sufficient disclosure of their bias. Publish this a letter to the editor, where it belongs. And it shouldn’t have to be said, but the implication that construction would happen “over dead bodies” or graves is irresponsible, inflammatory, and just plain wrong and dumb. If the property owner develops, it’s going to be on the portion of their property that is NOT used as a cemetery. If the writer or other neighbors want to scrutinize or oppose potential development, even for their own selfish reasons, that’s great. If they want to question the property owner’s statements or intentions, go to town. Do it. The presentation of this piece as news (it is tagged as “news” and “local news”) or journalism makes it impossible to take the Source seriously.
John — the story has since been labeled “Commentary,” as it should have been. We regret the error.
Absolutely not ! Housing on a cemetery. The article did not say who owned the cemetery…did City of Bend own it and city council approve the sale? If so, the city council should have not approved the sale for any reason, especially housing. City council needs to stop all building plans and any further development of that site if possible. Certain parts of land in Bend needs to be off limits for any development, especially a cemetery . Next election, vote all city council out and vote for those who want to preserve our city. The “affordable housing” term is used much to often here and makes people feel good. The reality is, there will never be affordable housing in Bend. two reasons. 1. Bend is a resort town and the jobs that are here are service jobs that can’t pay real money. 2. The people and companies that build and own these properties are not local. They are in it to make money. The city should be looking for companies that are not service business and can pay more to their employees. The city should provide tax incentives to employers to move to Bend.