You’ve likely heard the doom-tales: aquifers depleted, rivers low, wells going dry. Over the past 20 years or so, the West has experienced a megadrought that hasn’t been matched in 500 years. And this time, unlike the 1500s, the problem is made worse by the advent of human-caused climate change. This year has been better than many, but the effects of years of drought are still among us in the form of habitat degradation and longtime farmers and ranchers’ loss of long-reliable water sources.

Credit: Adobe Stock

Against this backdrop comes news from the Oregon Water Resources Department, signaling a massive change in the way it will handle new groundwater permits in the future. As was reported in last week’s Source Weekly, OWRD plans to put new rules in place that could limit the number of new wells that get dug in the state. Under a pending rule change, OWRD would only grant a new permit or license for groundwater or surface water if the department can determine that there is enough water to support that new infrastructure. This is a major change to how things have been done in Oregon up to now. Previously, if there wasn’t enough data about a particular place and its water availability, the OWRD’s policy was to approve the application, in something of a good-faith method. With this change, the data needs to show definitively that there is more water to be had. The rule change is aimed, at least in part, at mitigating problems currently seen in areas around the state, where the digging of new wells has caused other peoples’ established wells to decline.

Here in the Deschutes Basin, we’ve had a similar plan in place for quite some time. The Deschutes Groundwater Mitigation Program, “was developed to provide for new ground water uses while maintaining scenic waterway and instream water right flows in the Deschutes Basin.” It’s the program that has caused long, ongoing battles, like the one that continues over water access (and the fish and wildlife mitigation plan) at Thornburgh Resort.

In an era of megadrought and ongoing climate change, it’s the right move on behalf of OWRD โ€” albeit one that is long overdue. But if it sounds like something that could bump up against the state’s other big goals โ€” namely, building adequate amounts of housing for the people who live here โ€” it’s because it does. That’s not going to be easy. To that end, cities and those who live in them have a part to play in achieving more efficiency in their systems. In a description of the new groundwater allocation rulemaking, OWRD outlines steps cities can take to use less water overall. You may have heard of one of those water-saving measures recently, when the City of Bend began to issue rebates to homeowners for removing their lawns in favor of xeriscaping. That program filled quickly.

Its indoor rebate program, meanwhile, offers, “money-saving opportunities on new high-efficiency indoor equipment, such as washing machines, toilets, and hot water recirculators,” while the outdoor rebate program, “features high-efficiency irrigation devices, like drip systems, nozzles, and controllers.” These programs can begin to make a dent in water usage at the residential level โ€” though of course, looking out at seas of lush green grass at schools and parks in a high desert landscape reminds us there are many more opportunities for tightening up on water use overall.

$
$
$

We're stronger together! Become a Source member and help us empower the community through impactful, local news. Your support makes a difference!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Trending

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Iโ€™m right there with you until you start expecting me to change my habits so that we can build more homes. How about, instead, we put a hard cap on new homes and growth?

  2. And why is exactly do we need to build more homes? I think this is the real question to ask. Have developers move on and develop elsewhere and stop building McMansions that are unaffordable to most and destroying our landscape with unattractive tract housing. It takes a lot of water to build a house let alone the usage that ensues when people live there. We dont need to grow Bend, as we obviously dont have the infrastructure to support the growth. I would like to see an article written of why we need to keep building more housing. And why cant our city create affordable housing and stop the short term rental permits as this does not afford our middle and lower income families to afford housing. Lets deal with what we have going on instead of building more City of Bend!

  3. Groundwater is dependent on surface water for recharge. It’s long past time for changes to allocation rules for both ground and surface water.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *