In a city where a burger without fries is around $18 and costs seem to be rising for residents every day, it’s tough to go whole-hog on the notion of a transportation fee being tacked on to Bend residents’ water and sewer bills, to the tune of around $180 per year. The City of Bend is pondering that as a solution to help pay for the costs of maintaining and fixing roads — something not covered by the massive Transportation GO! Bond voters approved several years back.
On the one hand, those potholes that crop up in the winter aren’t going to fix themselves. Roads need maintenance, and that costs taxpayers money.
On the other, the costs of paying for infrastructure and maintenance are already pressing down on people who live here, where the median listing price of a home is nearing $900,000 and local salaries are not keeping pace. With tens of thousands of tourists visiting Bend every day in the summertime, it’s not radical to wonder whether those tourists could be footing some of the bill for a portion of the use, too. Is there a middle ground that doesn’t put all the costs on the backs of strapped residents?
A transportation fee is one of several tools municipalities can use to pay for things. Another one: A gas tax. Voters in Bend shut down the idea of an expanded gas tax in 2016 when it came before them, but that type of revenue would have been better spread out among the users of the roads – including the tourists who use them. Of course, that option has diminishing returns in a world where electric cars are becoming more of the norm – but in the short term, as in, over the next decade at the least, that would have diversified the income streams. During that process in 2016, the political will was first toward a gas tax, and then swiftly reversed to be against it. Voters just said no — and as a consequence, lost out on the potential income that could have been gleaned from all those tourists gassing up their RVs and adventure rigs when they come and go. Now, while the City of Bend is offering roundtable discussions about the transportation fee to gauge residents’ support, it doesn’t need the vote of the people to move it forward.
If our roads and their maintenance are in the dire shape that necessitates a transportation fee, it would appear we need to utilize all the tools in the toolbox to address the problem. Spreading out the load seems appropriate.
Those who are concerned about the issue have two more opportunities to share their thoughts with the City Council and to help them consider all the tools in the toolbox — though the City has not made the times and dates necessarily convenient for the people for whom an added fee will affect most: working people.
The next two roundtables about the proposed transportation fee are Sept. 13 — from 9:30 am to noon at the Municipal Court building on 15th Street, and Oct. 11 at the same time and place. Both of these roundtables are during the middle of the week and smack-dab in the middle of the workday, but they’re also available to attend via Zoom. If you normally work that day, hopefully your boss cares as much about transportation fees as you do….
This article appears in Source Weekly September 14, 2023.
MAKE LOCAL JOURNALISM HAPPEN
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
To add some additional information: there are many more opportunities to share your input beyond watching the roundtables we are holding with community representatives (including nonprofits, schools, parks, the businesses community, neighborhoods, and our advisory committees).
For instance: folks can email us at councilall@bendoregon.gov, they can come to our night time meetings to give us comments (or comment from home by Zoom), they can call our public phone numbers listed on our Council website, and they can talk with their Neighborhood District members (we have told all the neighborhoods we will come to them to present and have two planned already, including one coming up with three of our Neighborhoods in the Southeast part of town.) People can also visit http://www.bendoregon.gov/transportation-f… where you can get more information and also the contact info for our staff person handling the project, Sarah Hutson, who is happy to answer questions and take input as well.
We have been receiving emails from folks regularly about this and will continue to have opportunities for input beyond the focused conversations we are having with stakeholders at our roundtable meetings.
Wow! Melanie, how generous! We can watch Zoom! We can send email! Democracy in action. Melanie, you and all the Dems on the council know damn well this tax (and let’s be crystal clear – this is a tax) would never pass in an election. Bend does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending problem. Let’s really open the books and share with the city how every penny is spent. I’ll bet any amount of money that voters would put road maintenance (as opposed to some generic b.s. like ‘transportation”) ahead of some of the programs currently in the budget.
And let’s keep the tourists out of this. We are already reaming them with a TOT, and a huge % of our employment base is 100% dependent on tourists. You could completely get rid of TOT and tourists would still be paying way more than their fair share (a phrase the libs really like to use).
While I’m generally in favor of Council’s vision of how to move this city forward, this process frankly feels like a fait accompli. The amount of money we’re talking about, for both residents and local small businesses is no small amount. If Council is truly interested in getting as much feedback as possible they need to schedule meetings and accept face-to-face public comment during the evening. To do otherwise feels like you really want to just move past this as quickly as possible because you know what the community will say.
To continue forward in this manner doesn’t feel whole lot different than the crap Adair and DeBone are pulling at the County level and that’s not a good look. Passing this fee/tax without putting it to a public vote will allow future Council candidates to use this issue as a cudgel and, frankly, they won’t be wrong.