On June 9, the Bend Park & Recreation District was forced to close its new Whitewater Park due to safety concerns. The park, meant to offer a safe passage for recreational floaters as well as a fun zone for more advanced whitewater enthusiasts, was expected to be a huge draw for the areaโso a rapid closure for safety issues was not ideal.
Less than a week before the closure, a Portland firm hired by BPRD was in the midst of a telephone survey of 402 Bend residents, working to “track the awareness, perceptions, and priorities of Bend residents in regards to parks and recreation services,” according to the subsequent report.
What the survey found: 68 percent of people surveyed found BPRD’s role in making Bend a tourist destination to be a priority. To put that in perspective, winning an election with 60 percent of the votes is generally considered a huge winโso in light of the problems with the Whitewater Park, a 68 percent “approval rating” for steering Bend parks as tourist destinations is high.
The survey was happeningโand residents were expressing their majority approvalโat the same time as complaints were rolling into the BPRD offices. That’s a sign that Bend residents still believe in the new role parks is playing as part of an overall push to make Bend a tourist destination.
Still, the survey was commissioned just before the actual closure of Whitewater Parkโwhich causes some concern over what the numbers would look like should the survey happen today. The Whitewater Park was opened once again this past week, with better waves in the whitewater channel and a safer passage in the passageway channel.
Other interesting statistics from the BPRD report: 90 percent of people surveyed were “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with the parks and recreation services in Bend. Of the people who reported not being satisfied, the main reasons for dissatisfaction were too much money spent on parks, and money being “wasted or mismanaged.” When broken down by demographic, 100 percent of people age 18 to 34 said they’re “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with BPRD.
Also of interest: When asked whether parks are providing a good value for the tax dollar, 74 percent of survey respondents agreed that Bend’s recreation services are providing a good value, and 68 percent agreed that Bend’s parks and trails offer a good value. Compare that to the 47 percent of respondents who agreed that K-12 public schools are offering a good value, and the 10 percent of respondents who think the street repair and maintenance services offer good value, and it’s clear that residents still place a lot of faith in our parks department. They might not know how BPRD is structured (just 44 percent of respondents correctly identified BPRD as an agency that’s separate from the City of Bend), but overall, our community supports its parks and their expanding role.
For an “approval rating” that’s pretty high, the Bend Park & Recreation District gets the Glass Slipper.
This article appears in Aug 3-10, 2016.








So in this survey we can assume one person from 18-34 answered the phone. Who answers there phone for a number they do not recognize…. only one age demographic I can think of, seems a little misrepresentation for the “glass slipper” award. How about actual numbers of people surveyed and there age.
If you’re interested in the full survey results, including demographics about the 402 respondents to the survey, and comparisons with surveys conducted in 2013 and 2010, you can find it at http://www.bendparksandrec.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016.8.2_Board-Report.pdf. Pages 5-26. -Julie Brown, Bend Park and Recreation District
This was not a valid survey. First because this survey was paid for and the contractor was selected by the agency who’s performance was being evaluated. Then the survey itself did not adhere to scientific methods and just relied on telephone convenience. The results are meaningless or at least the best money can buy.
We were hoodwinked! I will never, ever again vote for a Bend Park bond!!!
We were sold on safe passage for floaters and animals, NOT an unneeded tourist attraction!
I’ve had it with tourist needs trumping housing we need for OUR workers.
GO HOME!!