More than 4,200 people applied for a concealed gun permit in Deschutes County last yearโmany of them women. One local woman is on a mission to ensure they’re properly prepared.
“I support a woman’s right to choose.
Revolver or semi-automatic.
Come train with me.”
That’s the opening statement on the website run by Sharon Preston, a local woman who says she’s trained about 4,000 women in how to handle a firearm. About 75 percent of her focus is introducing them to the sport of shooting. The other 25 percent is focused on self-defense. Many women seek her training to qualify for a concealed carry permit.
Preston’s company, “Ladies of Lead,” has been in operation in Redmond for five years and she sees no decline in interest among women to learn how to shoot and protect themselves. Preston says crime continues to rise in Deschutes County and Central Oregonโparticularly the number of rape cases, drug-related crimes and even sex trafficking.
Before opening her company, Preston spent 20 years caring for and training horses for law enforcement and search and rescue efforts. She also trained horses so riders could shoot from them. Her husband was frequently away working and her son was in the military. Worried that caring for the herd of about 25 horses was becoming too much for someone alone much of the time, her son urged her to seek other opportunities. She did.
Preston began her company with a Facebook post, asking female friends if they would like to learn to shoot. She was overwhelmed with positive response, and Ladies of Lead was soon in business. “It was an amazing outpouring of women wanting education and comradery. We train mostly women, and a few good men,” she says.
At first she relied on other instructors to help train her clients, but soon she began training them on her own. Her goal is to help establish a culture of education and training for the safe use of firearmsโactions she strongly believes will help reduce crime and save lives.
Advocating for Gun Safety
Bend physician Megan Ellingsen, a gun owner and Central Oregon’s lead for the national group, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, supports gun safety education programs such as Preston’s. “Any program that focuses on safety is very welcome,” says Ellingsen. “We’re not an anti-gun organization and we support the 2nd Amendment.” Key to the organization is a program called Be Smart for Kids, which stresses the safe use and storage of guns around kids. “We have no problem with lawful citizens owning guns, but there is a lack of education in our community,” Ellingsen says.
Meanwhile, Deschutes County Sheriff’s Sgt. Nathan Garibay says there’s no question that safety training helps save lives. “With the right to own and carry a gun comes the responsibility to do it safely while complying with the law,” he told me. Garibay says most accidents involving firearms could be avoided with proper training.
Bend area resident Karl Findling is a longtime hunter and advocate for gun safety education. Noting that guns are a reality, he says educational safety training is critical to reducing risk and saving lives. The father of two young daughters, Findling says it’s important to empower girls who are interested in shooting at a young age. “I’m going through hunter safety class with one of my daughters soon and teaching them the proper use of firearms is important to their safety,” he says.
A Countywide Increase in Concealed Licenses
Preston says owning a handgun and having a concealed carry permit is a “huge burden,” but one that saves lives. “For the women I train who have been the victims of violent crime, the brutality of violence is no longer academic for them. It’s real.”
The Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office acknowledges a steady increase in concealed handgun license applications โ many from female applicants. Last year, Deschutes County residents filed 4,252 applications or renewals. There are 11,763 licensed concealed gun carriers in Deschutes County. The Sheriff’s office offers a half-day Saturday qualifying class and permitting process. A license is mailed to the successful applicants within a week.
Meanwhile, at Ladies of Lead women are instructed on how firearms work, their safe use, and how they must be respected for the safety of all who may encounter them, including children.
Noting that it’s easy to obtain a concealed carry permit in Oregon, Preston says her course can take about a year for anyone to feel completely comfortable in using a handgun. She describes the sport of shooting as “perishable” and a skill that needs routine practice.
Women Seeking Training
Why are more women seeking firearms training? “Unfortunately, it’s crime and its fear-based. I hate to see that. I try to calm their fears,” says Preston. Many of the women in her program are older, Preston says. Some are widowed and alone for the first time in their lives. “We try to give them a plan and build their confidence so they can live their lives large again.”
Students learn how to be aware of potential danger and, importantly, how to avoid it. For instance, Preston cautions women against using parking lots with several kids in tow, which creates vulnerable situations. “Just changing their MO and raising their awareness levels when out in public, improves personal safety,” she says.
Preston has also turned away people who are seeking training for various reasons. “There’s a huge responsibility to the public when you carry a gun outside of your home,” says Preston. She continued, “You can’t get involved in social or anti-social violence. You’ve got to avoid those situations.”
Handling Tough Situations
Preston calls dangerous encounters “critical dynamic incidents” when someone is threatening or inflicting harm on others. How one reacts to a threat of bodily harm is not an easy decision, but split-second action can save the lives of the innocent.
Her virtual laser training system takes clients through different scenarios where they must determine whether or when to shoot the assailant. Showing your firearm is not illegal in certain situations in Oregon, according to Preston. She says it’s legal for a person fearing violence against them to show their firearm to the would-be perpetrator without pointing it at them in order to defuse a critical encounter. However, pointing the firearm at the person can be considered menacing, she says.
“You have to be in reasonable fear of bodily harm happening to you. Ask yourself, am I in immediate jeopardy?” She says such factors as body size, frailty and age all come into play in the quick decision-making process of self-defense. Disparity of force, she says, is a critical determining factor.
Preston says the best fight anyone can have is the one you never get into. “If you can get out of it, do it. Using a firearmโpressing the trigger on that gunโis your last resort. That is the absolute last thing you want to do.”
In-Home Encounters
For in-home burglaries, Preston offers this advice. “You are not obligated to say you have a gun or to show it if someone is threatening to harm you in your home,” she says. “You don’t have to, but I recommend you have 911 on the phone. They hear everything. All of this is on tape with 911 and that will bode well for you,” she advises.
Preston acknowledges that many people have an inherent fear of guns. She contends a firearm is only a tool and with a culture of education about them and their proper use, people will become less afraid.
In answer to gun critics, she tells a story of an encounter with a woman in downtown Bend who approached her and said, “Live by the gun, die by the gun. Guns only bring evil unto themselves.” Preston responded, asking the woman, “What did the Sandy Hook school shooting bring unto itself?” Preston said the woman had no response and contends gun-free zones such as schools are soft targets for crime.
“Another thing I tell critics is to talk to a woman who has been brutalized. Tell that to my friend who was raped 15 feet from the guard shack over at a college in the Valley where the guard should have been but was on a smoke break. Say that to her,” says Preston.
Editor’s Note: The online version of this story has been edited from the print edition. Preston’s statement about knives killing more people than firearms has been found to be untrue, according to FBI statistics, and was thus removed.
This article appears in Feb 8-15, 2017.








This article is nicely done and shows a healthy side to firearms–thanks Brian, Sharon and The Source for “going there”in time when things seem chaotic. Safety and training with firearms is paramount to control when carrying in public places. NRA programs can save lives (Eddy the Eagle) and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Hunters Safety courses.
Arms control of the people is not an enumerated power!
video on arms, here it is: https://vimeo.com/60944105
State concealed carry laws which require a “permit” is an idea crafted in the pits of hell. The real purpose is to register gun owners! People think it is so cool to have a permit for concealed carry – they don’t understand that it is like the free sample of heroin.
Knives are used in more crime than a firearm and yet there isn’t the mass hysteria about knives. Why? Because we use them everyday to cut our meat, veggies or open a letter and we are familiar with them in the butcher block on the kitchen counter. We trust people coming at us on a two way highway going 55 to 65 miles an hour with only a line in the road separating us from collision. And yet people are terrified of firearms. Fear stems from lack of knowledge. I want to create a culture of education and open up more dialog about firearms. We need more education not less, we need more conversation not less. A firearm is a tool, the weapon in the human mind.
To clarify, knives are not used in more crimes than guns.
See these two sources for the statistics:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/baseba…
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article…
“And God knows, if anyone truly needs protection, it’s women!” – Dean Leffler’s, Feb. 17 letter.
Agreed! Lets revisit the issue of women’s safety, security and protection. In my Jan. 29 Ashland Daily Tidings letter I quoted from Larry Elder, who rightly stated: “A woman who demands further gun control legislation is like a chicken who roots for Col. Sanders.” Yet women’s safety, security and awareness goes beyond just firearms; there are places where women and everyone else aren’t legally allowed to carry a concealed handgun: courthouses, federal buildings, public schools, post offices, etc.
So what tips are available to women? Paxton Quigley, author of “Armed and Female: Taking Control” (2010) has posted an eight-minute online video titled, “Women’s Self-Defense Basics.” This is part of her “Not An Easy Target” seminar addressing how criminals target their victims: often women. This can be viewed online at http://www.paxtonquigley.com.
On Jan. 24, 1996, the Mail Tribune ran a letter of mine on Quigley’s “Armed and female” (1989). The sequel I just mentioned by same title is revised and expanded. The issue of women’s safety must be revisited and revised periodically. – James A. Farmer, Ashland
Medford, Oregon Mail Tribune: Sunday, February 24, 2013
Letters To The Editor
Continuing on,…….bear in mind The John Birch Society in Appleton, Wisconsin
at http://www.jbs.org and thenewamerican.com, respectively. Also, JPFO, Inc. “America’s
Aggressive Civil Rights Organization” at http://www.jpfo.org. Both The John Birch Society,
and JPFO, Inc. remain 100% pro-Second Amendment, pro-gun, and embrace
human dignity, freedom, and decency, including for our women. Also, Guns Owners
of America at http://www.gunowners.org. Thus other pro-gun institutions exist aside from
the NRA (National Rifle Association), which I likewise ardently support. I also endorse
JPFO’s 1999 book: “Dial 911 and Die: Exposing The Police Protection Myth” by
Attorney Richard Stevens. Learn more at JPFO’s web-site posted above.
Finally gun scribe, writer, former police captain, and expert on deadly/lethal force
Massad Ayoob. I have for years endorsed his 1980 book: “In The Gravest Extreme:
The Role Of The Firearm in Personal Protection”. The latter has withstood the
tests of the courts and judiciary for over 35 years and is endorsed by judges, criminal
defense attorneys, prosecutors, and law enforcement. Recently I purchased Massad
Ayoob’s sequel to the former: “Deadly Force: Understanding Your Right To Self
Defense.” These books and more remain available from “Police Bookshelf/Lethal
Force Institute” in Concord, New Hampshire. I hope this is of assistance.
James A. Farmer
Merrill, Oregon (Klamath County)
Native Oregonian since November 1956
LeeAnn Kriegh I said knives were USED in more crimes than guns. Didn’t say murdered with.
Thanks for clarifying, Sharon. I didn’t notice that you had changed the phrasing. In the print edition it says you say knives “kill more people than guns by far,” which is what I was saying is untrue. Do you have a source that says knives are used in more crimes overall? I’m sure it may be true; I’d just like to look at the statistics.
Sharon Preston is dedicated to educate to save lives, and her dedication to women is real.
Leann Kriegh : I should have explained that point more thoroughly regarding knives. Throughout American history the edged weapon from the sword to the axe and the javelin to the machete have been more readily available and easy to access thus being the tool of choice. To this day you don’t need a background check to purchase them. We don’t fear them as we do the firearm because of our knowledge of them and the almost daily use of them. Sorry for the confusion on that statement. Be safe out there!
That’s an interesting theory, but you had said “more” — as if, for the second time, you were citing a fact or statistic. Now you say it’s just an opinion. I’m pushing you on this not because what you’re teaching isn’t important but because it is. What you say as an expert is listened to, so please be careful to separate fact-based statements from your opinions. For myself, I fear guns more than knives not because of the reasons you mention but because more people are killed by guns every year and they can maim or kill people from a far greater distance than any knife. Guns are simply more powerful and far more dangerous, which is why I believe in background checks and also applaud you for teaching gun safety.
LeeAnn Kriegh: Didn’t say it was my “opinion”. There is a ton of information out there about edged weapons throughout history. You’re missing the entire point. The media and others have blamed the tool instead of the human using the tool for so long that you actually are afraid of the tool as if it will just press its own trigger. You proved the point in your statement. I was at a party last night were there were about 40-50 people. In the kitchen on the counter was a 8″ butcher knife being used to cut limes and veggies for guests. That knife never even got a second glance by all of the party goers all night long. If a gun had been on the counter I’m sure everyone would have noticed. (enter in-depth 30 minute conversation on the damage that can be done with a silent and swift knife in a crowd and a gun that can only point in one direction at a time and is loud drawing attention immediately towards the danger thereby allowing multiple directional counter attacks from the group to stop the threat. Magazine change speed, rifle vs handgun vs shotgun, multiple shooters and strategies of the Run~Hide~Fight active shooter training etc.) Do you see the point now? PEOPLE are injuring or killing people. If their tool is a truck, bomb, box cutter on a plane, baseball bat, machete or firearms then the real weapon here is the human mind. The entire point is that the responsibility is with the human. The shovel was just a shovel until it was used to kill her then it becomes a weapon. The comparison I was making about knives vs guns is to that line of thought. I appreciate the debate and the opportunity to add more to this discussion. During an interview you’re not always allowed the time to dig too deep into any one subject as the questions are coming at you at break neck speed. So situations like this occur where the focus is pulled away from the actual teachings. Come and take a class or 2 or 3 from us. We would love to have you in our group. http://www.ladiesoflead.com
I agree with LeeAnn. Now more than ever, we need to be careful about using language and numbers that we can’t support with studies and measured statistics. I hope the Source and it’s writers take heed.
Also, I think the deeper and more important issue hidden behind this article, while oddly not being directly addressed in it, is WHY we have a prevalence of domestic violence toward women in this country. What’s missing is a conversation about why it’s so prevalent and an exploration of what we can do to prevent it. If we really want to lessen domestic violence, we need this conversation and more resources for stopping it from occurring in the first place through appropriate social programs.
Source writers: How about a follow-up article about domestic violence (with solid stats), its roots, and what people and organizations are doing to prevent it without guns and violence?
Correction: that comment should have been by Katya Spiecker, not Volunteer Connect, which is now closed. I had a mix up with my login and tried to correct it, but it didn’t work.
Volunteer Connect – thank you for that great suggestion.
Sharon, I’m not missing the point. I’m well aware of the “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” argument. That’s not what I’m talking about. You made two factual claims about knives vs. guns. One is so blatantly false that it was pulled from the article. The other appears to be false, so I asked you about it, but you refuse to back it up with statistics. Again, I am all for gun safety, but I worry about someone who makes false claims in the media and refuses to simply acknowledge they’ve made a mistake.
LeeAnn: The perception of falsehood is in the time frame of which you choose to pull your statistics. Dates nor exact stats were given therefore, no falsehoods were spoken. You deduced the current time frame while I referenced throughout history time frame. Beating the proverbial dead horse here.
LeeAnn & Sharon:
How about if Sharon agrees in the future to say “knives and other weapons are used in more aggravated assaults than firearms” to make her point? After all her point was not about what weapon is more common or effective – it was an attempt to illustrate the common fixation on one single type of weapon.
And for LeeAnn you can then reference the FBIs 2015 UCR Table 22 which lists in column C a total of 167,323 assaults with firearms and the following numbers in columns D 125,167; E 217,407; F 182,418.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015
And now LeeAnn please turn you laser like focus for statistical accuracy towards the numbers in the graphic accompanying this story and explain on what they are based. The first question you can help with is what is the FBIs definition of “gun violence” and how are those numbers derived?
I for one am thankful for the right to protect myself and my loved ones with a firearm. Knowledge is power and training is paramount. I am a survivor of a violent crime. It took 20 minutes for the police to respond, in town. I know I am my first responder. A firearm is the equalizer, especially for women.
RC, that’s the kind of source I was looking for, thank you. That whole FBI site is interesting.
One page notes that “Firearms were used in 71.5 percent of the nations murders, 40.8 percent of robberies, and 24.2 percent of aggravated assaults.”
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/…
So you’re right that aggravated assaults is the best category to use if you’re trying to find the lowest use of guns. That’s because most assaults are fist-fights. You can see that because “personal weapons” (column E of table 22) are hands, fists, or feet. The page below shows that hands, fists, and feet were used in 26.9% of aggravated assaults, firearms were used in 22.5% of aggravated assaults, and knives and cutting instruments were used in 18.8%. The rest were “other weapons,” which they don’t define.
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/…
Of course, my larger point isn’t about knives vs. guns. I’m pushing Sharon the same way I would anyone else to stick to facts or else just say, “I think” or “It seems like.” I hate seeing false claims made in the media by anyone, on any side of any issue. I believe that when we say things that are false or misleading — which we all do now and then — we should take responsibility for it and do better the next time. And when we see false statements in the media, we should speak up and demand better as part of the process of restoring trust in the stories we read.
LeeAnn:
And that’s why I’m suggesting you look closer at the numbers in the graphic attached to this story. For instance – now that you have the FBI statistics in front of you if the total number of annual murders nationwide using firearms is 9,616 how is that figure of 93 people killed per day arrived at?
9,616 divided by 365 only comes out to roughly 26 per day…
LeeAnn: If there was a false claim you would be correct in you assault however, there was not a false claim. You assumed the time frame as did the Source Weekly. There should be a clarification of the statement not an out and out claim that it was false.
Sharon, as someone who teaches gun safety, are you suggesting that having a gun on a dinner table is no more dangerous than having a steak knife on the table? I hope you teach that guns should be locked up in the home. I work in a domestic violence shelter, so I know first-hand that guns harm more women than knives do. Statistics back this up: Domestic violence assaults involving a firearm are 12 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force [Linda E. Saltzman, et al., Weapon Involvement and Injury Outcomes in Family and Intimate Assaults, 267 JAMA, 3043-3047 (1992)] If there is a firearm in the house it will likely be used by the abuser and as frequently pointed at children as at the abused partner. Please spread facts to your students, not your own made-up beliefs and/or assumptions.
I appreciate our nations free and independent press responsibly fact-checking and correcting errors. Retracting an error/misstatement shows the journalistic integrity that we citizens depend upon. Thank you, Weekly Source! Also, thanks to LeeAnn K, who pointed out the initial error. I always appreciate learning when Ive misspoken and want to correct my future statements to be more accurateand my guess is that Sharon Preston will do likewise. Personal and professional integrity is important for individuals and media alike!
brendak: If you’d like to discuss the entirely different subject of gun safes and locking up firearms and ammunition so that no unauthorized persons can get to them when they are not in use and domestic violence then let’s have that conversation. This particular thread is in regards to my statement about knives throughout history being the tool of choice and drawing the sharp contrast between our fear of knives and our fear of firearms. Some have drawn their own time line as to my comment to mean just the last couple of years where my actual time line was a couple of hundred years total. Please take the time to read all of this thread before you start making untrue statements. To give an interview to such an anti gun audience and to have to defend myself over and over again for what should have been a clarification as to the meaning of the statement instead of basically calling me a liar, would have been more civil. In my statement I gave no stats, no time frame. That was all assumed. I stated that more people had died from knives than firearms. The clarification comes from the time line that I was talking about vs. the one the person writing the article had in mind. If there was a question regarding my statement, then clarification was never sought. Edged weapons have been used for a millennium and yet we don’t fear them the way we fear firearms. Not that firearms don’t deserve all the respect in the world. It’s a simple point really, that I’ve explained ad nauseam in previous posts.
I want to challenge Sharon Preston’s statement, quoting from Ladies of Lead, “Knives, she says, kill more people than guns by far.” According to the FBI that is false, not even nearly true. https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crim…
As you can see Firearms are responsible for a lot more murders than knives. So the statement “Knives kill more people than guns” is false.
perry55 read the thread.
Proud to know Sharon Preston, thankful to have trained with her and her Ladies of Lead! Thank you for all you do for our communities, Sharon. We need more women who think and act like you~
The number one tool used to commit murder in the United States is not guns or knives.
Its black men.
#hatefact