November has been a cruel month for public process in Bend.

Last week, we reported on the continued drama surrounding the City of Bend’s major $69 million project to modernize Bend’s water delivery and treatment system. Namely, city council’s Nov. 6, city council approval of a membrane filtration system to keep the city’s water safe.

Our concern wasn’t the ultimate outcome of the city councils 4-3 vote to select that technology over a UV system, but rather that the process and pathway to that vote has left a city council sharply dividedโ€”and that the decision was largely led by city staff members at the Water Division, as opposed to a robust public discussion. Moreover, that vote wedged yet more division into a project that already has its share of discord. On Nov. 13, Central Oregon LandWatch filed second a federal lawsuit to halt another section of the drinking water project; that requested injunction is a virtual repeat of one approved last year that halted construction of a large pipe to drain water from Tumalo Creek (“Who Will Speak for the Fish,” Nov. 21).

Our rising concern is that a small group involved in these major public projects is leapfrogging public processโ€”and justifying doing so by their desire to move forward. Unfortunately, the attitude that the ends justify the means does not seem to be limited to City Hall.

On Monday, after deciding it was too expensive to continue with operations and repairs, Pacific Power announced it was looking to divest its interests in the 103-year-old dam that creates Mirror Pond. Such an announcement should have opened the door (or, er, floodgates) for vigorous discussions (and may yet still; fingers crossed) about keeping the pond or returning the river to a more natural state. But, on the very same day, local businessmen Bill Smith and Todd Taylor proclaimed they were buying the land under Mirror Pond for the express purpose of maintaining a pond.

We acknowledge that the Source has openly opposed preserving the dam, and advocated for returning the Deschutes River to its free-flowing state. But, we want to emphasize: We are not discussing the river-over-pond issue here, but are spotlighting the process that is being used to reach that ultimate decision.

Yes, we say hats off to Smith and Taylor. Their actions are nobleโ€”to try to save Mirror Pond, an icon of Bend, is admirable, as is the effort to move forward the discussion that has been treading water for years. But that offer to buy the land under Mirror Pond in the name of retaining a pond at all costs ignores public opinion and the process of finding a community-based solution. Currently, the river-versus-pond debate is evenly split. The move also may sweep away the meaningful debate that has gone on for the past several years. Just last week, three knowledgeable citizen members were appointed to the nine-man Mirror Pond Ad Hoc Committeeโ€”the ultimate decision-making bodyโ€”in the hopes of adding greater perspective to the group. To swoop in and mandate a solution at the expense of public dialogue is troubling.

Thankfully, though, it seems as if Oregon State University-Cascades is honoring the concept that process does really matterโ€”and we end this Thanksgiving piece by awarding them a pumpkin pie-filled Glass Slipper.

Over the next two years, OSU-Cascades will begin its massive expansion from a two to four-year college, building toward a viable 5,000-student campus. But before the cement sets on those plans, they are setting up a series of “open houses” where they are inviting all community members to voice their concerns and questions. The expansion of OSU-Cascades is a big dealโ€”it will affect the character, the geography, the transportation, the economy and the spirit of Bend.

The first meeting is scheduled for Dec. 12, 6 to 8 pm. To accommodate more schedules, a meeting about the same issues will also occur on Dec. 13 from noon to 1:30 pm.ย Both meetings will take place in Cascades Hall on College Way on the COCC campus. Materials for the meetings will be posted in advance at osucascades.edu/4. This first open house focuses on the campus’ master plan. Meetings will be held quarterly.

This is the kind of consistent and meaningful dialogue that can bring about community-based solutions.

$
$
$

We're stronger together! Become a Source member and help us empower the community through impactful, local news. Your support makes a difference!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Trending

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. The actions of Smith and Taylor are noble? Hardly. This is the one percenters using their money to ensure that their opinion counts more than yours. What is the next move of Mirror Pond Millionnaires LLC if we don’t go along with their plan for “their” land? Will they try to stop any attempt to return the river banks to a more natural state? This is the ultimate fuck you to democracy and to the people of Bend.

  2. The OSU-Cascades siting “process” has already been “leapfrogged.” The single most important decision has already been made–and made without public input: Where to locate the campus.
    This decision has leapfrogged, as well, Bend’s Urban Growth Boundary process. A huge wrench has been thrown into planning for a sustainable future for our city by, possibly, siting the college in the very least sustainable spot.
    Lip service to public process, under the guise of “open houses,” will do nothing to address such concerns as listed in this week’s Laurence Dougharty letter to the editor.
    It is time that local media not only remark on what is happening, but courageously report on the “why.” Advertising revenues may decline, but knowing the truth trumps all.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *